<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:xcal="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xcal" xmlns:enc="http://www.solitude.dk/syndication/enclosures/">
  <channel>
    <title>Hill Heat: Climate Obstructionist Nominated For Federal Judiciary</title>
    <link>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2008/07/29/climate-obstructionist-nominated-for-federal-judiciary</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Science Policy Legislation Action</description>
    <item>
      <title>Climate Obstructionist Nominated For Federal Judiciary</title>
      <description>Last Tuesday, &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EPA&lt;/span&gt; whistleblower Jason Burnett testified before a Senate committee about the Bush administration&amp;#8217;s efforts to influence &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EPA&lt;/span&gt;&amp;#8217;s decision-making process in 2007&amp;#8212;interference that ended with Administrator Stephen Johnson being ordered, contrary to the Clean Air Act, to delay regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant and block California&amp;#8217;s landmark efforts to fight global warming. Burnett&amp;#8217;s most noteworthy new revelations came through several detailed anecdotes of White House interference. One of the most laughable, &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonindependent.com/view/former-epa-official"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000080;"&gt;as related&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; by the &lt;em&gt;Washington Independent&lt;/em&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;While Burnett charitably described it as a &amp;#8220;robust interagency process&amp;#8221; he was taken aback by &lt;span class="caps"&gt;OMB&lt;/span&gt; general counsel Jeff Rosen&amp;#8217;s ignorance about global warming-causing carbon dioxide molecules. Rosen requested that &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EPA&lt;/span&gt; only count carbon dioxide molecules in the air that came from automobiles, not ones from power plants. &amp;#8220;It was sometimes embarrassing,&amp;#8221; Burnett said, &amp;#8220;For me to return to &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EPA&lt;/span&gt; and say that I had to explain to &lt;span class="caps"&gt;OMB&lt;/span&gt; that carbon dioxide is a molecule and you can&amp;#8217;t differentiate in the air where a molecule came from.&amp;#8221;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Burnett&amp;#8217;s exasperation with Rosen was, unsurprisingly, not shared at the White House. In fact, the exact opposite seems to be the case. It turns out that about a month ago, President Bush nominated Rosen for a lifetime appointment to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Rosen was also recently involved &lt;span class="caps"&gt;OMB&lt;/span&gt;&amp;#8217;s efforts to resist a subpoena from the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, ending with the &lt;a href="http://theusconstitution.org/blog.warming/?p=423"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000080;"&gt;invocation of executive privilege&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/a&gt;in order to avoid a contempt of Congress vote for Deputy Administrator Susan Dudley. Prior to joining &lt;span class="caps"&gt;OMB&lt;/span&gt; in June 2006, he served as General Counsel for the Department of Transportation. During that time, &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DOT&lt;/span&gt; promulgated fuel economy standards for light trucks that were &lt;a href="http://theusconstitution.org/blog.warming/?p=201"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000080;"&gt;later invalidated&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that their biases toward the auto industry and failure to account for climate-change impacts represented an &amp;#8220;arbitrary and capricious&amp;#8221; violation of the Energy Policy Conservation Act (EPCA) and National Environmental Policy Act (EPCA).&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;This nomination is particularly noteworthy given the D.C. District Court&amp;#8217;s &lt;a href="http://www.endangeredlaws.org/pdf/dc_cir_jurisdiction_11_03.pdf"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000080;"&gt;special powers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to hear environmental cases&amp;#8212;including some cases brought under the Clean Air Act. But with mere months to go in President Bush&amp;#8217;s term and the obvious, serious concerns that Rosen would need to address before meriting confirmation, it&amp;#8217;s somehow doubtful that the Senate Judiciary Committee will hasten to act on his nomination.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:34:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:9e5ef5ad-010c-46ae-b79a-8845af6d8619</guid>
      <author>Warming Law</author>
      <link>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2008/07/29/climate-obstructionist-nominated-for-federal-judiciary</link>
      <category>Policy</category>
      <category>Action</category>
      <category>Bush</category>
      <category>EPA</category>
      <category>Mass</category>
      <category>v</category>
      <category>California</category>
      <category>waiver</category>
      <category>OMB</category>
      <category>endangerment</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/trackback/2322</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
