<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:xcal="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xcal" xmlns:enc="http://www.solitude.dk/syndication/enclosures/">
  <channel>
    <title>Hill Heat: Tag wind</title>
    <link>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/tag/wind</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Science Policy Legislation Action</description>
    <item>
      <title>Report Vindicates Sebelius: Coal&#8217;s Cost Puts Kansans 'At Significant Risk'</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted at the &lt;a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/03/26/coal-sebelius/"&gt;Think Progress Wonk Room&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/sebered.gif" style="float:right;margin-left:10px"/&gt; In October of last year, the administration of Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D) &lt;a href="/articles/2007/10/18/kansas-blocks-new-coal-plants"&gt;denied permits for two new coal-fired plants&lt;/a&gt; in her state because the greenhouse gases such coal plants would emit constitute a threat to the environment and public health. Last Friday, she &lt;a href="/articles/2008/03/21/kansas-governor-vetoes-attempt-to-override-denial-of-coal-plants"&gt;vetoed a legislative attempt&lt;/a&gt; to allow the plants to be built. Opponents of the veto claimed &amp;#8220;the decision is &lt;a href="http://www.kansascity.com/news/breaking_news/story/541098.html"&gt;costing the state jobs and economic investment&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#8221; and warned of &amp;#8220;higher electric bills for Western Kansas,&amp;#8221; where the plants were proposed.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;But a &lt;a href="http://www.innovestgroup.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;#38;task=view&amp;#38;id=175&amp;#38;Itemid=61"&gt;landmark report released yesterday&lt;/a&gt; by an esteemed financial research firm finds that, in fact, Sebelius has been acting in her state&amp;#8217;s best economic interests.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.innovestgroup.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;#38;task=view&amp;#38;id=175&amp;#38;Itemid=61"&gt;Innovest Strategic Value Advisors finds&lt;/a&gt; that Sunflower Electric Power Corporation, the company whose proposal was denied, failed to account for the effects of the likely regulation of carbon dioxide on the cost of coal-fired electricity when it sought to build two 700 MW coal plants in Holcomb, Kansas:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Innovest examined the economics of the transaction and determined that under the most plausible regulatory scenarios &lt;strong&gt;the decision to build new coal generating capacity will put Sunflower Electric&amp;#8217;s ratepayers &#8211; who in this particular case are the actual owners &#8211; at significant risk&lt;/strong&gt;. The report concludes that Sunflower&amp;#8217;s management has not adequately addressed the competitive and financial risks associated with climate change in deciding to pursue the expansion of its Holcomb Station power plant.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Sunflower was remiss in not considering that federal legislation that places a price on carbon emissions is extremely likely, considering the bipartisan support and strong international pressure for such action.&lt;/p&gt;


The report compares the economics of coal plants versus natural gas plants, which have a &lt;a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/co2_report/co2report.html"&gt;considerably smaller carbon footprint&lt;/a&gt;, and concludes:
&lt;blockquote&gt;In general, this analysis demonstrate that gas is the more financially sound choice for the construction of baseload generating capacity in all scenarios except 100% free allocation [to power companies] of carbon allowances.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;It is thus unsurprising that the coal lobby &lt;a href="/2007/11/05/kansas-coal-lobby-attacks-natural-gas-industry"&gt;attacked the natural gas industry&lt;/a&gt; when the decision was made.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;The report also notes that western Kansas has &amp;#8220;among the nation&amp;#8217;s most abundant wind resources&amp;#8221; and that the cost of wind power has plummeted 80% in the last 20 years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:04:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:c963cea2-ed99-4df2-8731-76eecf69ec12</guid>
      <author>Wonk Room</author>
      <link>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2008/03/26/report-vindicates-sebelius-coal%E2%80%99s-cost-puts-kansans-at-significant-risk</link>
      <category>Policy</category>
      <category>Legislation</category>
      <category>Action</category>
      <category>coal</category>
      <category>Massachusetts vs EPA</category>
      <category>natural gas</category>
      <category>wind</category>
      <category>Kansas</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/trackback/1986</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kansas Governor Vetoes Attempt to Override Denial of Coal Plants</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted at the &lt;a href="http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/03/21/sebelius-vetoes-coal/"&gt;Think Progress Wonk Room&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src='http://www.thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/coal-smokestacks.jpg' style="float:right;margin-left:10px" alt='coal-smokestacks.jpg' /&gt;Last October, the Kansas Department of Health &lt;a href="/articles/2007/10/18/kansas-blocks-new-coal-plants"&gt;denied air quality permits&lt;/a&gt; to a proposed coal plant expansion near Holcomb, KS, because of the danger greenhouse gas emissions pose to the climate.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Today, Sebelius &lt;a href="http://www.kansascity.com/news/breaking_news/story/541098.html"&gt;issued a long-expected veto&lt;/a&gt; of the legislature&amp;#8217;s plan to not only approve the plant but also &lt;a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN1926196520080219"&gt;strip the Department of Health of its regulatory capacity&lt;/a&gt;. From her veto statement:&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;blockquote&gt;This decision not only preserves Kansans&#8217; health and upholds our moral obligation to be good stewards of this beautiful land, but will also enhance our prospects for strong and sustainable economic growth throughout our state. Instead of building two new coal plants, which would produce 11 million new tons of carbon dioxide each year, I support pursuing other, more promising energy and economic development alternatives.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Industry opposition to the Sebelius administration has been intense. Following the air permit denial, Peabody Energy, one of the largest coal companies in the world, funded newspaper ads &lt;a href="/2007/11/05/kansas-coal-lobby-attacks-natural-gas-industry"&gt;attacking the natural gas industry&lt;/a&gt;.  Sunflower Electric Power Corporation, the rate-payer-owned company making the bid for the new plants &amp;#8211; &lt;a href="http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/feb/19/lawmaker_calls_power_cos_offer_improper/"&gt;offered a quid pro quo to Kansas State University&lt;/a&gt;, promising millions of dollars to fund energy research if the coal plants were approved.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:48:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:2d3e20a8-9862-4798-9337-8644c1c01c9d</guid>
      <author>Wonk Room</author>
      <link>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2008/03/21/kansas-governor-vetoes-attempt-to-override-denial-of-coal-plants</link>
      <category>Legislation</category>
      <category>coal</category>
      <category>Massachusetts vs EPA</category>
      <category>natural gas</category>
      <category>wind</category>
      <category>Kansas</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.hillheat.com/articles/trackback/1987</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
