Full committee markup.
Nomination hearing took place on May 1st.
05/08/2025 at 09:45AM
Climate science, policy, politics, and action
Business meeting to vote on nominees. Their nomination hearing took place on April 30th.
Nominees:
Heinrich announced his support for Travnicek, Beyer, and Garrish.
Travnicek and Beyer:
ayes 14 - 6, 11 ayes present.
Garrish: same vote, but Barrasso is present.
Abbey:
ayes 12-8
Over the next few weeks, we’re watching the House closely as Republicans kick off voting on their budget reconciliation bill, which is chock-full of handouts to polluters and billionaires and is on track to be one of the most harmful, costly, and sweeping pieces of legislation in recent history.
On Wednesdays, May 7, 14, and 21st starting around 4pm we’re rallying at the U.S. Capitol steps to fight back against Republicans’ attempts to pass massive cuts to essential programs to provide handouts to billionaires and polluters. RSVP now.
Subcommittee hearing
Witness:
Hamilton testified in defense of FEMA:
As the senior advisor to the President on disasters and emergency management, and to the Secretary of Homeland Security, I do not believe it is in the best interest the American people to eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Having said that, I am not in a position to make decisions and impact outcomes on whether or not a determination as consequential as that should be made. That is a conversation that should be had between the President of the United States and this governing body.
Subcommittee hearing.
Witness:
Chair Andy Harris (R-Md.), Ranking Member Sanford Bishop (D-Ga.)
Department of Agriculture (USDA) | ||
---|---|---|
Increases | ||
Program | (millions of $) | Description |
Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) | +15 | FSIS inspects meat, poultry, and egg product plants to ensure food safety nationwide. Several States have their own equivalent inspection program, and FSIS shares in the cost of these programs. Increases are needed to support increased production and demand for services. |
Rental Assistance Grants | +74 | The Budget provides funding to renew the rental assistance grant contracts at $1.7 billion. This prevents the default of the $9 billion in USDA underwritten multifamily housing direct loans, that depend on the rental assistance grants for the debt service. |
Cuts, Reductions, and Consolidations | ||
Program | (millions of $) | Description |
National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) | -602 | The Budget eliminates programming in NIFA, such as activities related to climate change, renewable energy, and promoting DEI in education that were prioritized under the Biden Administration. In addition, the Budget reduces funding for formula grants. Instead, the Budget focuses on the merit-based Agriculture and Food Research Initiative. The Budget protects funding to youth and K-12 programs such as 4-H clubs, tribal colleges, and universities. This investment would help prepare future generations of farmers. It also ensures HBCUs are amply funded. |
Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and USDA Research Statistical Agencies | -159 | The Budget reduces funding for research sites across the Nation and reduces funding for research projects. The Budget also makes small reductions to the Economic Research Service and National Agricultural Statistics Service to stop climate research added by the Biden Administration while ensuring some analysis and data collection continues. |
Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS)—Private Lands Conservation Operations | -754 | The Budget eliminates discretionary funding for conservation technical assistance. While funding has helped producers deploy conservation practices on their lands, many have been forced to participate in the program in order to comply with State environmental regulations such as California’s Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program, which regulates agricultural runoff. |
NRCS Watershed Operations | -16 | The Budget eliminates funding to renovate locally owned dams in the NRCS Watershed Programs. These programs received an influx of funding through IIJA. Currently, there is over $100 million in unobligated balances between the two programs. |
Rural Development Programs | -721 | Infrastructure loans are prioritized for aging rural water and wastewater systems, as well as technical assistance through the “Circuit Rider” program balanced with reductions in the grants. Other specialty water grants and earmarks are not funded except where the tax base cannot support loans, including maintaining funding for Native American Tribes. Community facility grants are eliminated, as the Congress has been earmarking nearly 100 percent of them. No new USDA funding is needed for broadband expansion. The Budget would also eliminate rural business programs, single family housing direct loans, self-help housing grants, telecommunications loans, and rural housing vouchers. Rural Development salaries and expenses are reduced commensurately. |
Farm Service Agency (FSA) Salaries and Expenses: Farm Production and Conservation-Business Center (FPACBC) | -358 | The first Trump Administration placed the FSA, NRCS, and Risk Management Agency under one umbrella: FPAC-BC. The staff-heavy FSA struggles with hiring due in part because of labor market competition. The Budget reduces funding in order to reflect the Agency’s plans for efficiencies, which include improving online services. |
National Forest System Management | -392 | The Budget reduces salaries and expenses by $342 million, and saves an additional $50 million by eliminating funding for the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration program, and reducing funding for recreation, vegetation and watershed management, and land management regulation. The Budget fully supports the Executive Order 14225, “Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production,” to improve forest management and increase domestic timber production. The requested funding level supports timber sales, hazardous fuels removal, mineral extraction, grazing, and wildlife habitat management. |
Forest Service Operations | -391 | The Budget reduces funding for expenses including salaries and facility leases to streamline the Agency’s management structure and reduce their real property footprint. |
State, Local, Tribal, and NGO Conservation Programs | -303 | The Budget reduces grant programs that subsidize management of State and privately-owned forests. While the Budget provides reduced support for Federal wildland fire management activities, these partners should be encouraged to fund their own community preparedness and risk mitigation activities. |
Forest and Rangeland Research (Except Forest Inventory and Analysis) | -300 | The President has pledged to manage national forests for their intended purpose of producing timber. The Budget reduces funding for the Forest and Rangeland Research program because it is out of step with timber production, but maintains funding for Forest Inventory and Analysis, a longstanding census of forest resources and conditions. |
Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP) | -425 | The Budget ends CSFP and replaces it with MAHA food boxes. The MAHA food boxes provide food directly to seniors. Unlike the current approach using food banks, which provide those in need with shelf-stable foods, MAHA boxes would be filled with commodities sourced from domestic farmers and given directly to American households. |
McGovern-Dole Food for Education Program | -240 | The McGovern-Dole Food for Education program buys agricultural commodities from U.S. farmers and donates them in the form of foreign aid. Only a small portion of the program’s funding goes toward purchasing U.S. commodities, given the high transportation costs and large portion of funding provided for technical assistance. While these donated commodities totaled only $37 million in 2023 (0.01 percent of all U.S. crop sales), they undercut commodity prices in markets abroad. The elimination of this program is consistent with the elimination of other in-kind international food donation programs in the Budget, including Food for Progress and Food for Peace Title II Grants. |
Subcommittee hearing.
Chair Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tenn.)
Ranking Member Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio)
Witness:
Department of Energy | ||
---|---|---|
Cuts, Reductions, and Consolidations | ||
Program | (millions of $) | Description |
IIJA Cancellation | -15,247 | The Budget cancels over $15 billion in funds committed to build renewable energy, removing carbon dioxide from the air, and other technologies. The Budget also ends funding to electric vehicle and battery makers and cancels the Carbon Dioxide Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act. |
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) | -2,572 | The Budget reorients EERE programs to early-stage research and development programming, eliminating funding for climate change-related activities like the Biden Administration’s Justice40. This proposal would support technologies that promote fossil-fuel power and other priorities, such as bioenergy. |
Office of Science | -1,148 | The Budget reduces funding for climate change and renewable energy research. The Budget maintains U.S. competitiveness in areas such as high-performance computing, artificial intelligence, quantum information science, fusion, and critical minerals. |
Environmental Management (EM) | -389 | The EM program performs activities at 14 active cleanup sites and operates a geologic disposal facility (Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico). The EM topline is being reduced by $389 million, which reflects a reduction of about $178 million for the transfer of responsibility from the EM program to the National Nuclear Security Administration for the Savannah River site in South Carolina, where plutonium pit production capabilities would be developed. The Budget maintains the Hanford site in Washington at the 2025 enacted level but reduces funding for various cleanup activities at other sites. |
Advanced Research Project Agency‒ Energy (ARPA-E) | -260 | The Budget reduces funding for ARPA-E. |
Office of Nuclear Energy | -408 | The Budget reduces funding for non-essential research on nuclear energy. Continued research priorities include developing innovative concepts for nuclear reactors, researching advanced nuclear fuels, and maintaining the capabilities of the Idaho National Laboratory. |
Office of Fossil Energy (and Carbon Management) | -270 | The Budget renames the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management back to the Office of Fossil Energy, focusing on the research of technologies that could increase extraction of domestic fossil energy and critical minerals. |
Subcommittee hearing entitled “Cleaning Up the Past, Building the Future: The Brownfields Program.”
Witnesses:
Opening remarks, as prepared, of Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee Chairman Mike Collins (R-GA) from today’s hearing, entitled, “Cleaning Up the Past, Building the Future: The Brownfields Program”:
I want to first thank our witnesses for joining us this morning to discuss EPA’s Brownfields Program. As we review the program, last authorized in 2018, I’m looking forward to learning from our witnesses about their experiences with the program, suggestions for program improvements, as well as the tangible impact it’s had on the ground.
All of us here, throughout our travels, have seen abandoned warehouses, dilapidated gas stations, or vacant factories. Often, these blighted properties, which are eyesores in our communities, are considered brownfields. Brownfields are properties that are abandoned or underused due to concerns about environmental contamination. EPA has estimated that there are more than 450,000 brownfield sites across the United States. Their redevelopment and reuse can help increase local tax bases, create jobs, and encourage additional development.
According to EPA, since its inception, the program has made over 10,800 sites ready for productive reuse, leveraged more than $40.4 billion in additional cleanup and redevelopment funding, and helped to create or leverage more than 270,000 jobs.
However, property owners and developers are often hesitant to finance the redevelopment of these sites because of possible liability under CERCLA.
CERCLA liability is no joke. CERCLA has extremely stringent liability standards that could result in a current property owner being held responsible for cleanup costs at a site, even if there was no negligence on their part or if other parties had previously caused the contamination.
This program provides common-sense liability relief to folks who want to improve a degraded site. The EPA Brownfields Program helps communities assess and evaluate contamination at these sites and provides funding to help clean up and promote their redevelopment.
For example, in my district in Georgia, the program assisted the City of Greensboro in addressing contamination at an old cotton mill. As part of this project, approximately 2,600 tons of contaminated soil were removed from the property, and the mill was ultimately redeveloped and converted into a 71-unit apartment complex.
Federal funding through the Brownfields Program helps attract other non-federal project funding for assessment, remediation, and redevelopment efforts. But we know that just throwing hard-earned taxpayer money at problems doesn’t make them go away.
That’s why I also want to underscore the importance of programmatic efficiencies and regulatory relief when it comes to redevelopment and timely project completions.
For far too long, the EPA has placed untenable regulatory and bureaucratic burdens on hardworking Americans that cost them time and money. That’s why I am working with my colleagues here in Congress and with the Trump Administration on efforts to reduce red tape and streamline permitting processes.
At the end of the day, these types of improvements will help important projects get done more efficiently – whether it’s redeveloping Brownfields sites or constructing an Army Corps project. And that benefits all Americans.
Full committee hearing.
Legislation:
Witness:
Subcommittee hearing.
Chair John Hoeven (R-N.D.)
Witness:
Department of Agriculture (USDA) | ||
---|---|---|
Increases | ||
Program | (millions of $) | Description |
Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) | +15 | FSIS inspects meat, poultry, and egg product plants to ensure food safety nationwide. Several States have their own equivalent inspection program, and FSIS shares in the cost of these programs. Increases are needed to support increased production and demand for services. |
Rental Assistance Grants | +74 | The Budget provides funding to renew the rental assistance grant contracts at $1.7 billion. This prevents the default of the $9 billion in USDA underwritten multifamily housing direct loans, that depend on the rental assistance grants for the debt service. |
Cuts, Reductions, and Consolidations | ||
Program | (millions of $) | Description |
National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) | -602 | The Budget eliminates programming in NIFA, such as activities related to climate change, renewable energy, and promoting DEI in education that were prioritized under the Biden Administration. In addition, the Budget reduces funding for formula grants. Instead, the Budget focuses on the merit-based Agriculture and Food Research Initiative. The Budget protects funding to youth and K-12 programs such as 4-H clubs, tribal colleges, and universities. This investment would help prepare future generations of farmers. It also ensures HBCUs are amply funded. |
Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and USDA Research Statistical Agencies | -159 | The Budget reduces funding for research sites across the Nation and reduces funding for research projects. The Budget also makes small reductions to the Economic Research Service and National Agricultural Statistics Service to stop climate research added by the Biden Administration while ensuring some analysis and data collection continues. |
Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS)—Private Lands Conservation Operations | -754 | The Budget eliminates discretionary funding for conservation technical assistance. While funding has helped producers deploy conservation practices on their lands, many have been forced to participate in the program in order to comply with State environmental regulations such as California’s Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program, which regulates agricultural runoff. |
NRCS Watershed Operations | -16 | The Budget eliminates funding to renovate locally owned dams in the NRCS Watershed Programs. These programs received an influx of funding through IIJA. Currently, there is over $100 million in unobligated balances between the two programs. |
Rural Development Programs | -721 | Infrastructure loans are prioritized for aging rural water and wastewater systems, as well as technical assistance through the “Circuit Rider” program balanced with reductions in the grants. Other specialty water grants and earmarks are not funded except where the tax base cannot support loans, including maintaining funding for Native American Tribes. Community facility grants are eliminated, as the Congress has been earmarking nearly 100 percent of them. No new USDA funding is needed for broadband expansion. The Budget would also eliminate rural business programs, single family housing direct loans, self-help housing grants, telecommunications loans, and rural housing vouchers. Rural Development salaries and expenses are reduced commensurately. |
Farm Service Agency (FSA) Salaries and Expenses: Farm Production and Conservation-Business Center (FPACBC) | -358 | The first Trump Administration placed the FSA, NRCS, and Risk Management Agency under one umbrella: FPAC-BC. The staff-heavy FSA struggles with hiring due in part because of labor market competition. The Budget reduces funding in order to reflect the Agency’s plans for efficiencies, which include improving online services. |
National Forest System Management | -392 | The Budget reduces salaries and expenses by $342 million, and saves an additional $50 million by eliminating funding for the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration program, and reducing funding for recreation, vegetation and watershed management, and land management regulation. The Budget fully supports the Executive Order 14225, “Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production,” to improve forest management and increase domestic timber production. The requested funding level supports timber sales, hazardous fuels removal, mineral extraction, grazing, and wildlife habitat management. |
Forest Service Operations | -391 | The Budget reduces funding for expenses including salaries and facility leases to streamline the Agency’s management structure and reduce their real property footprint. |
State, Local, Tribal, and NGO Conservation Programs | -303 | The Budget reduces grant programs that subsidize management of State and privately-owned forests. While the Budget provides reduced support for Federal wildland fire management activities, these partners should be encouraged to fund their own community preparedness and risk mitigation activities. |
Forest and Rangeland Research (Except Forest Inventory and Analysis) | -300 | The President has pledged to manage national forests for their intended purpose of producing timber. The Budget reduces funding for the Forest and Rangeland Research program because it is out of step with timber production, but maintains funding for Forest Inventory and Analysis, a longstanding census of forest resources and conditions. |
Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP) | -425 | The Budget ends CSFP and replaces it with MAHA food boxes. The MAHA food boxes provide food directly to seniors. Unlike the current approach using food banks, which provide those in need with shelf-stable foods, MAHA boxes would be filled with commodities sourced from domestic farmers and given directly to American households. |
McGovern-Dole Food for Education Program | -240 | The McGovern-Dole Food for Education program buys agricultural commodities from U.S. farmers and donates them in the form of foreign aid. Only a small portion of the program’s funding goes toward purchasing U.S. commodities, given the high transportation costs and large portion of funding provided for technical assistance. While these donated commodities totaled only $37 million in 2023 (0.01 percent of all U.S. crop sales), they undercut commodity prices in markets abroad. The elimination of this program is consistent with the elimination of other in-kind international food donation programs in the Budget, including Food for Progress and Food for Peace Title II Grants. |
On Tuesday, May 6, 2025, at 10:15 a.m., in room 1324 Longworth House Office Building, the Committee on Natural Resources will hold a markup to consider legislative proposals to comply with the reconciliation directive of cutting $1 billion in net spending over 10 years included in section 2001 of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2025, H. Con. Res.14.
Committee print amendment in the nature of a substitute
Amendment from Rep. Mark Amodei adopted 24-19, Rep. Will Hurd (R-Texas) joining Democrats against.
As amended, the ANS adopted 26-17, Rep. Adam Gray (D-Calif.) joining Republicans in favor.
Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D-N.Y.) was not present for the roll call votes.
The bill plans four lease sales for the coastal plain of the Alaska Arctic National Wildlife Refuge over the next ten years. The plan also envisages a restart of the lease sales in the National Petroleum Reserve of Alaska plus quarterly onshore oil and gas lease sales and new offshore tenders. The legislation would open about 85 percent of BLM land “with high potential” for future oil and gas development to leasing, while low and medium-potential areas would be largely closed to leasing. It would mandate quarterly oil and gas lease sales and return royalty rates — which were increased to 16.67 percent through the Inflation Reduction Act — back down to 12.5 percent, and cut coal-mining royalty rates from 12.5 percent to 7 percent.
Also included (Sec. 80173) is language from the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act, which transfers offshore oil and gas revenues in federal waters to the bordering state governments.
Included are proposals to prohibit the implementation of the Bureau of Land Management’s Resource Management plans for the Offices of Colorado River Valley, Colo.; Grand Junction, Colo.; Rock Springs, Wyo.; Buffalo, Wyo.; Miles City, Mont.; and North Dakota.
The bill would create a new fee that project sponsors can pay to accelerate environmental reviews and limit litigation while also increasing the fee to file a protest against oil and gas lease sales.
The bill would also zero out several unobligated IRA funds for climate causes, require more timber harvests and create a new revenue-sharing mechanism for renewable energy on public lands.
SEC. 80101. ONSHORE OIL AND GAS LEASE SALES.
SEC. 80102. NONCOMPETITIVE LEASING.
SEC. 80103. PERMIT FEES.
SEC. 80104. PERMITTING FEE FOR NON-FEDERAL LAND.
SEC. 80105. REINSTATE REASONABLE ROYALTY RATES.
SEC. 80111. GEOTHERMAL LEASING.
SEC. 80112. GEOTHERMAL ROYALTIES.
SEC. 80121. COASTAL PLAIN OIL AND GAS LEASING.
SEC. 80122. NATIONAL PETROLEUM RESERVE-ALASKA.
SEC. 80131. SUPERIOR NATIONAL FOREST LANDS IN MINNESOTA.
SEC. 80132. AMBLER ROAD IN ALASKA.
SEC. 80141. COAL LEASING.
SEC. 80142. FUTURE COAL LEASING.
SEC. 80143. COAL ROYALTY.
SEC. 80144. AUTHORIZATION TO MINE FEDERAL MINERALS.
SEC. 80151. PROJECT SPONSOR OPT-IN FEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS.
SEC. 80152. RESCISSION RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE DATA COLLECTION.
SEC. 80161. PROTEST FEES.
SEC. 80171. MANDATORY OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS LEASE SALES.
SEC. 80172. OFFSHORE COMMINGLING.
SEC. 80173. LIMITATIONS ON AMOUNT OF DISTRIBUTED QUALIFIED OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF REVENUES.
SEC. 80181. RENEWABLE ENERGY FEES ON FEDERAL LANDS.
SEC. 80182. RENEWABLE ENERGY REVENUE SHARING.
SEC. 80201. RESCISSION OF FUNDS FOR INVESTING IN COASTAL COMMUNITIES AND CLIMATE RESILIENCE.
SEC. 80202. RESCISSION OF FUNDS FOR FACILITIES OF NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION AND NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARIES.
SEC. 80203. SURFACE WATER STORAGE ENHANCEMENT.
SEC. 80204. WATER CONVEYANCE ENHANCEMENT.
SEC. 80301. PROHIBITION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ROCK SPRINGS FIELD OFFICE, WYOMING RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN.
SEC. 80302. PROHIBITION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUFFALO, WYOMING FIELD OFFICE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN.
SEC. 80303. PROHIBITION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MILES CITY, MONTANA FIELD OFFICE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN.
SEC. 80304. PROHIBITION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NORTH DAKOTA RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN.
SEC. 80305. PROHIBITION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COLORADO RIVER VALLEY FIELD OFFICE AND GRAND JUNCTION FIELD OFFICE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLANS.
SEC. 80306. RESCISSION OF FOREST SERVICE FUNDS.
SEC. 80307. RESCISSION OF NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AND BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT FUNDS.
SEC. 80308. RESCISSION OF BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT AND NATIONAL PARK SERVICE FUNDS.
SEC. 80309. RESCISSION OF NATIONAL PARK SERVICE FUNDS.
SEC. 80310. CELEBRATING AMERICA’S 250TH ANNIVERSARY.
SEC. 80311. LONG-TERM CONTRACTS FOR THE FOREST SERVICE.
SEC. 80312. LONG-TERM CONTRACTS FOR THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT.
SEC. 80313. TIMBER PRODUCTION FOR THE FOREST SERVICE.
SEC. 80314. TIMBER PRODUCTION FOR THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT.