Testimony on Accelerating Logging and Other Bills

On Tuesday, May 21, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., in room 1324 Longworth House Office Building, the Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Federal Lands will hold a legislative hearing on the following bills:

  • H.R. 184 (Rep. McClintock), “Action Versus No Action Act”, to require that only two alternatives be considered with respect to certain proposed collaborative forest management activities
  • H.R. 2785 (Rep. Leger Fernandez), “New Mexico Land Grant-Mercedes Historical or Traditional Use Cooperation and Coordination Act”
  • H.R. 7695 (Rep. Hageman), To provide that the final rule titled “Special Areas; Roadless Area Conservation” and issued on January 12, 2001 (66 Fed. Reg. 3244) shall have no force or effect and require the Secretary of Agriculture to construct certain roads on National Forest System lands, and for other purposes.
  • H.R. 8682 (Rep. Downing), “Accelerating Forest Management Act”
  • H.R. 8686 (Rep. Gosar), To amend the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013 to withdraw and reserve certain public land in the vicinity of Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona.
  • H.R. 8688 (Rep. Hurd), “Forest Health and Wildlife Risk Reduction Act”
  • H.R. 8735 (Rep. Panetta), “American Sovereignty and Monterey Historic Military Site Study Act”
House Natural Resources Committee
   Federal Lands Subcommittee
1324 Longworth

05/21/2026 at 10:00AM

Markup of FY27 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Bill and the FY27 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Bill

Subcommittee markup

Department of the Interior FY2027 Proposed Budget

EPA FY2027 Proposed Budget

Transportation FY2027 Proposed Budget

The budget calls for $15.9 billion for the Department of the Interior, a $2.3 billion decrease from the fiscal 2026 enacted level.

The budget agains calls for the unification of the Interior and Agriculture departments’ wildland firefighting activities under a single agency within the Interior Department.

The budget also calls for consolidating the Endangered Species Act and Marine Mammal Protection Act permitting within one agency in the Interior Department.

The fiscal year 2027 budget in detail:

  • Renewable Energy: cuts $45 million from the Bureau of Land Management and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and eliminates renewable energy funding which includes onshore and offshore wind energy.
  • Bureau of Land Management: cuts $480 million and slashes funding for Wildlife and Aquatic Habitat Management by $139 million, which includes funding for sage grouse and threatened and endangered species.
  • US Fish and Wildlife (FWS): cuts $526 million, decreasing the National Wildlife Refuge System by 20 percent, eliminates grant programs managed by States, Tribes, and other nations, and moves NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service into FWS ($125 million transfer).
  • National Park Service: cuts $1.06 billion
  • U.S. Geological Survey (USGS): cuts $526 million, a 37 percent reduction that eliminates ecosystems, and dramatically cuts funding for core science and natural hazards.
  • Bureau of Indian Affairs: cuts $378 million, including the elimination of the Indian Guaranteed Loan program and the Indian Land Consolidation program, and a 34 percent reduction in funds that support self-governance and directly fund tribal operations.
  • Bureau of Indian Education: cuts $436 million, a 32 percent reduction; some eliminations include funding for Tribal Colleges and Universities, Replacement School Construction, and Early Child and Family Development.
  • Wildland Fire: Transfers all U.S. Forest Service Wildland Fire Management functions to DOI.

Details of National Park Service: cuts $1.06 billion

  • Operation of the National Park System: cuts $760 million or 26 percent. The skinny budget suggests they may change the funding formula to defund or drastically cut support for smaller or less visited park units.
  • National Recreation and Preservation: cuts $86 million or 93 percent
  • Historic Preservation Fund: cuts $170 million, or a 94 percent cut, and eliminates everything except funding for Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs).
  • Construction: cuts $40 million, or a 45 percent cut.

The budget also calls for a $10 billion mandatory fund to establish the Presidential Capital Stewardship Program within the National Park Service. The fund’s purpose would be “to coordinate, plan, and execute targeted, priority construction and beautification [sic] projects in and around Washington, D.C.”

For the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency), the President seeks $4.2 billion in base discretionary budget authority for FY 2027—a reduction of $4.6 billion (a 52.4 percent reduction) from the FY 2026 enacted level of $8.8 billion. EPA’s budget request would support a workforce of 12,500 full-time equivalent (FTE) workers.

EPA requests $1.7 million in new funding to administer the Good Samaritan Remediation of Abandoned Hardrock Mines Act of 2024. This program will issue “Good Samaritan” permits and investigative sampling permits to remediators of legacy hardrock mines, who will be exempt from liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and the Clean Water Act.

EPA seeks the reconsideration of greenhouse gas (GHG) regulations and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). In FY 2027, EPA intends to address New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) actions under the Clean Air Act for sources of air pollutants in multiple categories including those in the power plant, oil, and natural gas sectors.

EPA plans to identify Brownfields and Superfund sites for qualifying AI projects and develop guidance for more efficient environmental reviews for certain reuse.

EPA seeks to reduce regulations on the auto industry and encourage domestic manufacturing. In FY 2027, EPA will reconsider and reevaluate three major on-road vehicle regulations.

The FY 2027 budget request proposes reductions in the following program areas:

Clean and Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Funds. EPA proposes a reduction of $2.5 billion. The reduction would return primary responsibility for funding local water infrastructure projects to states. The budget would provide $305 million to allow states to adjust to alternative funding sources.

Categorical Grants. EPA proposes a reduction of $1.1 billion. The proposed budget includes an approximately 91 percent decrease from FY 2026 enacted levels. This includes elimination of most categorical grants while maintaining funding for the Tribes and Underground Injection Control grants.

Office of Research and Development. EPA proposes a reduction of $235 million. The proposed budget would provide $281 million for statutorily required research in support of EPA’s core mission areas.

Federal Support for Air Quality Management. EPA proposes a reduction of $112.7 million. This program supports the development of state implementation plans and administers air grants.

Civil Enforcement. EPA proposes a reduction of $94.1 million. The proposed budget would provide $137 million for the Civil Enforcement Program which ensures compliance with environmental laws and regulations.

Criminal Enforcement. EPA proposes a reduction of $54.6 million. The proposed budget would provide $33.9 million for the Criminal Enforcement Program which enforces environmental laws investigating criminal conduct.

Research: Air and Energy. EPA proposes a reduction of $63.2 million. The proposed budget would include $32.0 million for this research program that provides assessments of air quality impacts.

Targeted Airshed Grants. EPA proposes a reduction of $31.6 million. The proposed budget would provide $36.2 million for the Targeted Airshed program.

Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Fund (WIFIA). EPA proposes a reduction of $64 million. The WIFIA program provides low-cost loans for large water and wastewater projects.

The FY 2027 President’s Budget requests $114.1 billion in budgetary resources for the Department of Transportation (DOT), including $26.8 billion in discretionary budget authority and $87.3 billion in mandatory budget authority.

From the American Public Transportation Association:

The budget requests $16.3 billion (-23 percent) for public transit and $2.8 billion (-82 percent) for passenger rail in FY 2027.

The budget does not request to continue any advance appropriations under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), which results in substantial cuts to key public transit and passenger rail investments, including:

  • Capital Investment Grants (-$1.6 billion)
  • Low or No Emission Competitive Grants (-$1.05 billion)
  • State of Good Repair grants (-$950 million)
  • All Station Accessibility Program (-$350 million)
  • Ferry Competitive Grants (-$250 million)
  • Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Grants (-$7.2 billion)
  • Railroad Crossing Elimination Grants (-$500 million)
House Appropriations Committee
   Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Subcommittee
   Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Subcommittee
H-140 Capitol

05/21/2026 at 08:00AM

A Review of the President’s Fiscal Year 2027 Budget Request for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation

Subcommittee hearing.

Witnesses:

  • Lieutenant General William H. “Butch” Graham, Jr., Chief of Engineers and Commanding General, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers *Adam Telle, Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), United States Army

FY 2027 budget request:

House Appropriations subcommittee hearing was April 16th.

Full House Appropriations committee markup on May 20.

Senate Appropriations Committee
   Energy and Water Development Subcommittee
124 Dirksen

05/20/2026 at 02:30PM

Right-Wing Attacks on Environmental Nonprofits

On Wednesday, May 20, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., in room 1324 Longworth House Office Building, the Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will hold an oversight hearing titled “The Profit Engine Driving Environmental Nonprofits.”

Witnesses:

House Natural Resources Committee
   Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee
1324 Longworth

05/20/2026 at 02:00PM

2026 Hurricane Season — What You Need to Know Ahead of NOAA’s Outlook

On Thursday, May 21, NOAA will issue its first prediction for the 2026 Atlantic hurricane season, highlighting how a forecasted strong El Niño could impact tropical development this year. However, this is just one force at play — with climate change’s role in fueling stronger storms likely not to be mentioned in their official forecast.

Ahead of your coverage of NOAA’s outlook announcement, join Covering Climate Now and Climate Central for a special webinar aimed to paint a more complete picture of the factors, both natural and human-caused, influencing this hurricane season.

In this press briefing, meteorologists and reporters from hurricane-prone areas will highlight how to examine climate change’s “fingerprint” on warm ocean waters, provide expert analysis of what 2025’s hurricanes can tell us about this season, and explore tips to effectively make the climate connection when reporting on this year’s forecast.

Panelists

  • Daniel Gilford, climate scientist, Climate Central
  • Fernanda Ramos Garces, meteorologist, Univision Houston
  • Kelesha Williams, climate reporter, Jamaica

RSVP

Climate Central
Covering Climate Now
05/20/2026 at 01:00PM

Full Committee Markup of Fiscal Year 2027 Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Bill and Fiscal Year 2027 Legislative Branch Bill

Full committee markup.

Energy and Water Development:

Legislative Branch:

Subcommittee markup of the Energy and Water Development bill took place May 15; markup of the Legislative Branch bill was on April 30.

Subcommittee mark:

  • Slashes the Department of Energy’s Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation programs (formerly called Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy) by $1.3 billion or 40 percent.
  • Revokes $2.8 billion of Bipartisan Infrastructure Law resources from the Department of Energy’s Carbon Dioxide Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program Account, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, and Fossil Energy and Carbon Management programs.
  • Cuts funding for Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E) by $50 million or 14 percent
  • Cuts the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation account by $282 million or 12 percent
  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission – The bill provides a total net appropriation of $136 million, a decrease of $16 million below the fiscal year 2026 enacted level
  • Eliminates funding for the Corps of Engineers’ Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program, which is responsible for cleaning up sites with contamination resulting from the nation’s early atomic energy program
  • Cuts the Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management by $863 million or 10 percent, slowing down clean-up efforts that address the nation’s environmental legacy from the Manhattan Project through the end of the Cold War
  • The bill provides a total of $9.8 billion for Army Corps of Engineers, a decrease of $660 million below the fiscal year 2026 enacted level
  • Army Corps of Engineers: Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation – The bill provides $5 million, a decrease of $2 million below the fiscal year 2026 enacted level
  • Northwest Regional Commission – The bill provides zero funding, $1 million below the fiscal year 2026 enacted level

Riders allow firearms on Corps of Engineers’ public lands and prohibit implementation of “Clean Energy for New Federal Buildings and Major Renovations of Federal Buildings.”

House Appropriations Committee
   Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Subcommittee
2359 Rayburn

05/20/2026 at 11:00AM

Examining the Potomac Interceptor Collapse

Subcommittee hearing entitled “Corrosion, Collapse, and Clean-Up: Examining the Potomac Interceptor Collapse.”

Hearing memo

Witnesses:

Panel I

  • Jessica Kramer, Assistant Administrator, Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;
  • Col. Francis B. Pera, Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District
  • Edward Wenschhof, Acting Superintendent, Chesapeake & Ohio Canal National Historical Park, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior.

Panel II

  • David Gadis, Chief Executive Officer and General Manager, DC Water
  • Tom Neltner, National Director, Unleaded Kids.

The Potomac Interceptor (PI) is a 54-mile sanitary sewer system. The pipe was built between 1961 and 1963 after legislation enacted on June 12, 1960, “authorized the District of Columbia [(DC)] to plan, construct, operate, and maintain a sanitary sewer to connect Dulles to the Washington, DC sewer system.” Today, the PI runs through parts of Virginia, Maryland, and DC, and serves Fairfax County, Loudoun County, the Town of Vienna, Herndon, Dulles Airport, and Montgomery County, Maryland. The PI is located on different land jurisdictions and at various points is located on National Park Service (NPS) property.

The PI is constructed mostly of reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) ranging from “30-inch to 96-inch diameter round, reinforced concrete pipe in the main trunk to 13-foot by 7.75-foot rectangular, reinforced concrete pipe in the lower reaches of the sewer system.” It has eleven tunnel sections and two river tunnel crossings underneath the Potomac River. The PI carries flows of up to 60 million gallons of wastewater daily from Loudoun and Fairfax Counties in Virginia and Montgomery County in Maryland to the Potomac Pumping Station in Washington, DC. Wastewater from the pump station is “sent to the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant [in Southwest, DC] for treatment before discharge into the Potomac River.”

Before 1996, the District’s water and sewer functions were housed inside DC government. From 1985 to 1996, what is now known as DC Water operated as the Water and Sewer Utility Administration within the Department of Public Works. In 1996, DC and Congress changed that structure by creating the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, now known as DC Water, as an independent authority of the DC government. This change made DC Water a public utility authority with corporate powers and an operating structure that is separate from the DC government. It is neither a private entity nor a standard DC agency. Rather, it is a public utility authority with its own board, staff, property, contracts, revenues, and debt authority. As such, DC Water has authority to operate and fund infrastructure, not just administer policy. DC Water’s statutory mandate is to plan, build, operate, maintain, finance, repair, modernize, and improve water distribution and sewage collection, treatment, and disposal systems. DC Water can sue and be sued, hire employees, own property, accept grants and loans, contract with DC, the federal government, Maryland, Virginia, and local governments, borrow money, issue revenue bonds, and set service charges. DC law also gives DC Water dedicated revenues from water and sewer rates, fees, and charges imposed by the Authority. It must set rates, fees, levies, and other charges high enough to cover its costs and bond obligations.

DC Water exists pursuant to DC law, but the sewer system it runs is regional. The DC Code lists Blue Plains and the PI Sewer as joint-use sewerage facilities. The same law identifies Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, and Fairfax County as participating jurisdictions. As a result, DC Water’s board has 11 members: six from the District and five from those participating jurisdictions. The outside members participate only in decisions directly affecting joint-use sewerage facilities. Their seats on the board do not make DC Water a Maryland or Virginia agency. The pipe may run through Maryland, the land may be federal park land, and the wastewater may come from several jurisdictions, but DC Water remains the operating authority responsible for the PI.

At the federal level, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) exercises regulatory oversight under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The CWA “establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States and regulating quality standards for surface waters” and allows EPA to develop pollution control programs. EPA’s jurisdiction includes enforcement of discharge permits under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), water quality standards, and oversight of consent decrees or administrative orders that may govern DC Water’s infrastructure investments and compliance obligations. If a collapse of the PI results in unauthorized discharges into the Potomac River or surrounding waters, EPA may initiate enforcement or require corrective actions under Sections 301 and 309 of the CWA.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) holds jurisdiction over certain aspects of navigable waters and related infrastructure under multiple legal authorities, such as Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the CWA. If a collapse of the PI or subsequent repair activities affect navigable waters or riverbanks, or require dredging, filling, or construction within federal waters, USACE permits and coordination will be required. USACE may also provide technical assistance or emergency engineering support under the Stafford Act and its own emergency authorities. Additionally, USACE designed, built, and operates the Washington Aqueduct, which produces drinking water for approximately one million people in DC and parts of Virginia, including Arlington County and portions of Fairfax County. On average the Washington Aqueduct produces 135 million gallons of water per day at two treatment locations in DC.

The National Park Service (NPS) owns the land on which a significant portion of the PI runs, and where the PI collapse occurred. If infrastructure is located within or impacts NPS property, NPS approval in the form of permits is required for access, construction activities, and environmental compliance. Special Use Permits for Construction are issued for “any construction-related activity on Park land where the construction-related activity is not the direct result of an official construction contract with the National Park Service” including the “[i]nstallation and/or upgrade of utilities including water, sewer, electric, and/or communications.” Alternatively, Right-of-Way Permits “are appropriate to authorize utility uses such as power lines, water lines, fiber lines, and cellular communications equipment.” NPS must also adhere to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), “which requires federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of their proposed actions prior to making decisions,” when issuing permits for projects. These permitting processes may be long and burdensome which impacts when, and how fast, any repairs can be completed for the PI.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) also had a role in responding to the PI collapse. On February 18, 2026, DC Mayor Muriel Bower declared a “local public emergency” in response to the wastewater spill and “requested federal support through a Presidential Emergency Disaster Declaration request.” A few days later, President Trump approved a federal emergency declaration for DC, which made federal disaster assistance available to supplement the PI collapse response efforts. In doing so, FEMA was authorized to “coordinate all disaster relief efforts to alleviate the hardship and suffering caused by the emergency on the local population and to provide appropriate assistance to save lives, to protect property, public health and safety and to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe.”

At the state level, the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) “[r]egulates unauthorized discharges into Maryland waterways and wetlands, monitors shellfish harvesting, and oversees drinking water safety and enforcement.” The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) also “initiated a special water quality monitoring initiative to measure bacteria levels along Virginia’s Potomac River shoreline.” This allows the Virginia DEQ to “supplement the sampling efforts of DC Water, the DC Department of Energy & Environment, the Maryland Department of Environment and others.”

Within DC, the District Department of Energy and Environment also exercises complementary regulatory authority over water quality and environmental protection under D.C. Code § 8–151.01 et seq., including local implementation of federal environmental programs and coordination with EPA.

On January 19, 2026, an underground section of the PI, located by Lock 11 on the Chesapeake & Ohio (C&O) canal, collapsed. The cause of the collapse remains under investigation.46 When the collapse happened, boulders that were sitting over the PI fell into the broken section of the pipe and created a blockage of the pipe. With the boulders blocking the pipe, the wastewater had nowhere to go, which created pressure upstream of the break, and the wastewater started to overflow through manholes located upstream from the collapse location.

As the wastewater flowed out of the collapse location and the manholes, it flowed down an unnamed tributary that runs parallel to the Clara Barton Parkway, under the C&O canal via a culvert, and down to the Potomac River by Swainson Island.

DC Water was alerted to the activity via “security cameras [that] detected unusual activity near one of [the] odor control facilities along the Clara Barton Parkway.” DC Water then activated emergency response protocols, including installing a bypass pumping system, and worked to stabilize the damaged pipe. According to DC Water, “[t]he bypass system began operating early January 24, 2026, when six large pumps were turned on to convey wastewater into a controlled section of the C&O Canal, routing it around the break and back into the sewer system further downstream.” While this bypass allowed wastewater to be diverted around the collapse site and back into the PI, initially there were isolated incidents of wastewater overflows due to various factors, such as increased volumes of wastewater due to melting snow or other issues. For example, in early February there was a significant overflow which was estimated to have released “several hundred thousand gallons of wastewater” due to issues with the pumps. Specifically, “[t]he overflow event occurred when multiple pumps were out of service for required cleaning and maintenance after becoming clogged by non-disposable wipes that were flushed into the system,” which also happened during a period of high flow in the sewer system.

According to DC Water, there has not been any release to the Potomac River since February 8, 2026. In March, however, it was determined through sampling, that contaminated water was leaking out of the culvert that is located under the portion of the C&O Canal that was being used as part of the bypass system to route the wastewater around the PI collapse. It is through this culvert that the unnamed tributary flows downstream until it enters the Potomac River. USACE subsequently installed a sandbag dam and pumping operation to divert the water through the pumps and into the PI.

It is estimated that over 240 million gallons of raw sewage flowed into the Potomac River before the overflow was completely contained. For comparison, the Exxon Valdez oil spill of 1989—which has been regarded as “one of the largest environmental disasters in U.S. history”— resulted in 11 million gallons of oil being released into the environment.

On April 20, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice, on behalf of the EPA, filed a federal CWA complaint against DC Water for the PI failure. On the same day the State of Maryland brought a parallel action seeking civil penalties, cleanup costs, and natural resource damages. These suits allege that DC Water failed to address known severe corrosion in the pipe for years, contributing to the rupture that released more than 200 million gallons of untreated sewage into the Potomac River.

House Energy and Commerce Committee
   Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee
2123 Rayburn

05/20/2026 at 10:15AM

Markup of Research and Development Acts for Surface Transportation, Next-Generation Geothermal, and Water Power

Full Committee Markup of:

  • H.R. 8748, Surface Transportation Research and Development Act of 2026
  • H.R. 8790, Next-Generation Geothermal Research and Development Act
  • H.R. 7129, Water Power Research and Development Reauthorization Act

H.R. 8748, Surface Transportation Research and Development Act of 2026

The Surface Transportation Research and Development Act of 2026 reauthorizes and strengthens key Department of Transportation research, technology, and data programs through fiscal year 2031. The bill supports transportation research and innovation by improving coordination of transportation data activities, advancing research into emerging technologies and infrastructure resilience, and helping develop science- and technology-driven solutions to improve the safety and efficiency of America’s transportation systems.

H.R. 8790, Next-Generation Geothermal Research and Development Act

The Next-Generation Geothermal Research and Development Act directs the Department of Energy to support research, development, demonstration, and commercial application activities related to next-generation geothermal and closed-loop geothermal systems.

H.R. 7129, Water Power Research and Development Reauthorization Act

The Water Power Research and Development Reauthorization Act reauthorizes and expands the Department of Energy’s research, development, demonstration, and commercial application activities for hydropower and marine energy technologies to support innovation, grid resilience, workforce development, and America’s domestic energy capabilities.

House Science, Space, and Technology Committee
2318 Rayburn

05/20/2026 at 10:00AM

Nuclear Power Plant Deregulation Bills

On Wednesday, May 20, at 10:00 a.m., U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Subcommittee on Clean Air, Climate and Nuclear Innovation and Safety, will hold a hearing to examine S. ____ Build Nuclear with Local Materials Act, a discussion draft of S. ___ The RECHARGE Act, and a discussion draft of S. ____ Enrichment Licensing Modernization Act.

Witnesses:

  • Nick Loris, President, C3 Solutions, climate denier
  • Adam Stein, PhD, Director, Nuclear Energy Innovation, The Breakthrough Institute
  • Patrick White, PhD, Group Leader for Fusion, Safety, and Regulation, Clean Air Task Force

Legislation:

  • S. ____ Build Nuclear with Local Materials Act, To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to allow the use of commercial-grade steel and concrete in non-safety-related structures at nuclear power plants
  • RECHARGE Act Discussion Draft, To exempt the conversion of brownfields and retired fossil fuel electric generation facilities into “advanced” nuclear reactor plants from the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
  • [Enrichment Licensing Modernization Act Discussion Draft], To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to align the licensing of uranium enrichment facilities with other fuel cycle facilities under that Act
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
   Clean Air, Climate and Nuclear Innovation and Safety Subcommittee
406 Dirksen

05/20/2026 at 10:00AM

The Federal Reclamation Program

On Wednesday, May 20, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. in room 1324 Longworth House Office Building, the Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries will hold a hearing titled “The Federal Reclamation Program’s Next Century.”

House Natural Resources Committee
1324 Longworth

05/20/2026 at 10:00AM