Featured Speaker:
- Senator John Kerry (D – MA)
Introduction by:
- Melody Barnes, Executive Vice President for Policy, Center for
American Progress Action Fund
After years of denial, delay, distraction and distortion, climate change
is changing the political climate. Australia’s John Howard recently
became the first national leader voted out of office in large measure
because of his failure to respond to citizens’ concerns about global
warming. Newly elected Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has made global warming
his first priority in office. Australia’s awakening is not an isolated
example. Eighty-three percent of Chinese support action on climate
change. Between 2006 and 2010 China plans to improve energy efficiency
by 20 percent. The dialogue in the United States is also shifting,
albeit too slowly. Fifty-nine percent of Americans now endorse taking
major steps soon to combat global warming, and 33 percent more think we
need modest steps. Unfortunately this 92 percent of the American public
is still looking to President Bush for action on this key issue.
Just last week representatives of more than 180 nations met in Bali to
chart a course toward a new global agreement to control climate change
that will succeed the Kyoto Protocol. Together – in spite of American
obstruction – they produced a roadmap for the new climate negotiations
that set a target date of 2009 for the next treaty. How do we avoid the
missteps that plagued the Kyoto Treaty? How do we create a framework
that includes industrialized nations as well as the developing world?
Sen. Kerry – who attended the Bali conference and led the U.S. Senate
delegation – will lay out a strategy to follow the Bali roadmap and
expand the existing emissions trading market, promote an efficient and
effective technology development and implementation program, launch an
aggressive effort to protect the world’s remaining forests, and embrace
technology transfer. This will require innovative financing and
investment – and, if properly implemented, will create major new
opportunities for American industry to create the jobs of the future.
Center for American Progress Action Fund
1333 H St. NW, 10th Floor
Washington, DC 20005
RSVP
Center for American Progress
District of Columbia
12/19/2007 at 10:00AM
“Does the current framing and scaling of the climate/energy issue
adequately capture the challenge posed? If not, what might be a more
appropriate frame and scale?”
Speakers
- Dr. James G. Anderson, Philip S. Weld Professor, Department of
Chemistry and Chemical Biology and Department of Earth and Planetary
Sciences, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard
University
- Dr. Daniel Schrag, Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences and the
Director of the Harvard University Center for the Environment, Harvard
University
The issues of global energy demand and climate response are, at one
level, complex and contentious. However, they are joined by simple but
important considerations. While the flow of energy is important to the
global economic infrastructure, the flow of energy within the Earth’s
climate system reveals simple but compelling conclusions. These will be
explored in this briefing.
American Meteorological Society
485 Russell
12/18/2007 at 12:00PM
On December 18, the Brookings Institution will host Senator Richard G.
Lugar, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
for a conversation on the lack of action on U.S. energy security and
the challenges the next president will face on this
issue. Indiana’s
longest-serving senator, Lugar was first elected in 1976, and is
recognized as one of the nation’s leading voices on foreign relations
and national security.
U.S. dependence on increasingly scarce fossil fuels threatens U.S.
security while also undermining international stability. Absent
revolutionary changes in energy policy, U.S. foreign policy goals may be
undermined, living standards may erode, and the U.S. may become highly
vulnerable to the machinations of rogue states. These are the urgent
security questions facing the next U.S. president.
In his address, Senator Lugar will discuss the need for leadership by
the next president in combating energy threats to U.S. national
security. Brookings Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy Carlos
Pascual will provide introductory remarks and moderate the discussion.
After the program, Senator Lugar will take audience questions.
Participants
Introduction and Moderator
- Carlos Pascual, Vice President and Director
Featured Speaker
- Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.)
Location
Falk Auditorium The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Contact: Brookings Office of Communications
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: 202.797.6105
Brookings Institution
District of Columbia
12/18/2007 at 09:00AM
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
419 Dirksen
12/13/2007 at 02:30PM
The full committee will meet to receive testimony on global maritime
strategy initiatives. In October the Navy, Coast Guard, and Marine Corps
released A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century
Seapower.
Witnesses:
- Admiral Gary Roughead, USN, Chief of Naval
Operations
- Admiral Thad W. Allen, USCG, Commandant of
the Coast Guard
- General James T. Conway, USMC, Commandant of
the Marine Corps
EE News:
The hearing comes amidst growing concern over climate change in the
Arctic and its effect on national security and international
relations, as new shipping routes open and the area becomes more
accessible for oil and gas extraction.
The issue has not escaped the notice of the U.S. military. In
mid-October, the Coast Guard announced plans for an operational base
in Barrow, Alaska, to deal with increased shipping in the North Pole
region.
Later that month, the Navy, Coast Guard and Marines released an
updated national maritime strategy, which for the first time includes
global warming – particularly its effects in the polar region – as a
concern for the U.S. fleet.
It is that strategy that is at the center of Thursday’s House hearing.
“As we look at maritime strategy on a global basis, we can’t ignore
the future of the Arctic, the implications of access to the Arctic,
national security issues, environmental issues, energy issues
associated with it,” Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Thad Allen said in
September at a Washington, D.C., conference on national security
sponsored by the Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis. “Where do we
invest our money? How do we develop policies?”
Allen, one of three top military officials scheduled to testify at the
hearing, also drew a link between climate change in the Arctic and
U.S. participation in the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, a
hot-button issue this fall on Capitol Hill.
The United States is the only major industrialized nation that has
failed to ratify the 25-year-old agreement, which governs how
countries manage their exclusive economic zones and seabed mineral
rights, sets rules for navigating international waters, and addresses
species protection and other environmental issues.
“The United States must ratify the Law of the Sea treaty,” Allen said.
“We must become an international player. We must be at the table.”
House Armed Services Committee
2118 Rayburn
12/13/2007 at 10:00AM
The Senate is scheduled to consider the Farm Bill (H.R. 2419 with
S.Amdt. 3500) and the energy bill (H.R. 6 with S.Amdt. 3841).
Under a unanimous consent agreement, all amendments to the farm bill
were required to get 60 votes to end debate and be accepted.
In roll call vote
424,
the Dorgan-Grassley amendment (S.Amdt. 3695) to the Farm Bill was
rejected 56-43.
In roll call vote
425,
cloture on the latest compromise version of the energy bill was
rejected
59-40.
In roll call vote
426,
the Klobuchar “means-testing” amendment (S.Amdt. 3810) to the Farm Bill
was rejected 48-47.
The amendment, supported by the
administration,
would have limited subsidies to full-time farmers making less than
$750,000 a year, and landowners whose primary income comes from outside
the farm making less than $250,000 a year.
In roll call vote
427,
the Tester-Grassley Competition Title packer price manipulation
amendment (S.Amdt. 3666) to the Farm Bill was rejected 40-55.
The amendment, as explained by Tom
Philpott:
Price manipulation is clearly prohibited by the Packers & Stockyards
Act (PSA), but some judges have recently ruled that price manipulation
is excused if a packer or processor can show “a legitimate business
justification” for manipulating prices—such as gaining access to more
livestock at the price they want to pay. This defense to price
manipulation is not in the PSA and the court
rulings, if allowed to stand, weaken the law substantially. The
amendment filed by Senators Tester (D-MT), Harkin (D-IA), and Grassley
(R-IA) will clarify that the PSA cannot be
interpreted to include “a legitimate business justification” for
market manipulation.
U.S. Senate
Capitol
12/13/2007 at 08:30AM
S.2156, to authorize and facilitate the improvement of water management
by the Bureau of Reclamation, to require the Secretary of the Interior
and the Secretary of Energy to increase the acquisition and analysis of
water resources for irrigation, hydroelectric power, municipal, and
environmental uses
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee
366 Dirksen
12/11/2007 at 02:30PM
The Global Climate Campaign
intends synchronised demonstrations around the world on Saturday
December 8th 2007 – in as many places as possible – to call on world
leaders to take urgent action on climate change.
The ‘Call to Action’ for these demonstrations and related events that
will take place on December 8th 2007 is as follows :
“We demand that world leaders take the urgent and resolute action that
is needed to prevent the catastrophic destabilisation of global
climate, so that the entire world can move as rapidly as possible to a
stronger emissions reductions treaty which is both equitable and
effective in preventing dangerous climate change.
We also demand that the long-industrialised countries that have
emitted most greenhouse gases up to now take most of the
responsibility for the adaptive measures that have to be taken,
especially by low-emitting countries with limited economic resources.”
We feel that there is an overwhelming need to create a groundswell of
global opinion to push for the urgent and radical action on climate
change, without which we risk a global catastrophe of unimaginable
proportions.
Global Climate Campaign
12/08/2007 at 12:00AM