Manchin Permit Plan Mimics Rejected Capito-Inhofe Amendment to Inflation Reduction Act

Posted by Brad Johnson Fri, 09 Sep 2022 13:43:00 GMT

In a press briefing on Thursday, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre announced “we support the permitting reform bill” backed by Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), even though full text of the legislation has not been publicly released.

Remarkably, Jean-Pierre criticized the existence of the permitting process, saying, “Permitting always delays a new solar and new wind projects are among the longest in our — in our country.” [sic]

In August, Manchin told West Virginia Metro News that his permit plan “is something the Republican Party has wanted for the last five to seven years I’ve been with them.” Explaining the plan to attach his permit bill to the government-funding continuing resolution, “It either keeps the country open, or we shut down the government. That’ll happen Sept. 30, so let’s see how that politics plays out.”

Manchin expects the support of Republicans who are the strongest advocates of the fossil-fuel industry in the Senate, such as Sens. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, John Boozman of Arkansas, and John Barrasso of North Dakota, who have, as he noted, attempted to restrict environmental review of energy projects for years.

Inhofe and Barrasso are notoriously the most extreme proponents of climate denial in the Senate.

The exact language of the plan, expected to be released today, is unclear. As of year, there is only a one-page summary of Manchin’s plan and leaked draft legislation with an American Petroleum Institute watermark.

Sens. Capito and Inhofe proposed an amendment to the Inflation Reduction Act that would have compelled the construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline and greatly restricted environmental review, as Manchin’s one-pager intends. As expected, the amendment was ruled out of order for a reconciliation bill and not voted on.

Full White House press briefing exchange:
Does the White House support putting Senator Manchin’s permitting reform measure into the CR?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, we support the permitting reform bill, which will help us realize the benefits of the historic investments in the Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastruc- — Infrastructure Law as well. We want to see it enacted. We are working with Senator Schumer and Senator Manchin to find the best path forward.

We think it’s important to meet the country’s clean energy goals and to reduce cost and to promote energy security. Permitting always delays a new solar and new wind projects are among the longest in our — in our country.

So, right now, as you all know, we’ve seen gas prices moving downward at a record pace in — fastest pace in history — in our history. The point of this legislation is to help ensure a long-term clean energy supply for this country. And — and so, we’re going to continue to work with Senator Schumer on this.

Q With the permitting reform, the White House believes it could have an effect on a downward trend with gas prices?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: So, again, you know, we’ve done the work to see the prices of gas at the pump go down every day this summer — consecutive days, 86 days. It’s at three hu- — $3.75 per gallon nationally. And so, we’ve done the work to do that.

What we see this will help us do is ensure long-term clean energy supply for this country. And so, this is — this is a reason why we think this is important.

Q And just lastly on that: Is there any concern –there’s obviously differences amongst Democrats on this — that this could sink a CR and lead to a government shutdown?

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Meaning this particular —

Q Yeah, this issue.

MS. JEAN-PIERRE: Look, the way that we see this is this is not the first time that we’re going through a process — a CR process. We did it last year. And we believe that it can happen again, that Congress can move forward and get the CR done.

Full text of the Capito-Inhofe amendment:
SA 5383. Mrs. CAPITO (for herself and Mr. Inhofe) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 5194 proposed by Mr. Schumer to the bill H.R. 5376, to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 14; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

At the end of title VI, add the following

Subtitle F—Regulatory Authority

SEC. 60601. CODIFICATION OF NEPA REGULATIONS.

The revisions to the Code of Federal Regulations made pursuant to the final rule of the Council on Environmental Quality titled ``Update to the Regulations Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act’’ and published on July 16, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 43304), shall have the same force and effect of law as if enacted by an Act of Congress.

SEC. 60602. PROVIDING REGULATORY CERTAINTY UNDER THE FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT.

  1. Waters of the United States.—The definitions of the term ``waters of the United States’’ and the other terms defined in section 328.3 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on January 1, 2021), are enacted into law.
  2. Codification of Section 401 Certification Rule.—The final rule of the Environmental Protection Agency entitled ``Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification Rule’’ (85 Fed. Reg. 42210 (July 13, 2020)) is enacted into law.
  3. Codification of Nationwide Permits.—The Nationwide Permits issued, reissued, or modified, as applicable, in the following final rules of the Corps of Engineers are enacted into law:
    1. The final rule of the Corps of Engineers entitled ``Reissuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits’’ (86 Fed. Reg. 2744 (January 13, 2021)).
    2. The final rule of the Corps of Engineers entitled ``Reissuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits’’ (86 Fed. Reg. 73522 (December 27, 2021)).
SEC. 60603. PROHIBITION ON USE OF SOCIAL COST OF GREENHOUSE GAS ESTIMATES RAISING GASOLINE PRICES.
  1. In General.—In promulgating regulations, issuing guidance, or taking any agency action (as defined in section 551 of title 5, United States Code) relating to the social cost of greenhouse gases, no Federal agency shall adopt or otherwise use any estimates for the social cost of greenhouse gases that may raise gasoline prices, as determined through a review by the Energy Information Administration.
  2. Inclusion.—The estimates referred to in subsection (a) include the interim estimates in the document of the Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases entitled ``Technical Support Document: Social Cost of Carbon, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide Interim Estimates under Executive Order 13990’’ and dated February 2021.
SEC. 60604. EXPEDITING PERMITTING AND REVIEW PROCESSES.
  1. Definitions.—In this section:
    1. Authorization.—The term ``authorization’’ means any license, permit, approval, finding, determination, or other administrative decision issued by a Federal department or agency that is required or authorized under Federal law in order to site, construct, reconstruct, or commence operations of an energy project, including any authorization described in section 41001(3) of the FAST Act (42 U.S.C. 4370m(3)).
    2. Energy project.—The term ``energy project’’ means any project involving the exploration, development, production, transportation, combustion, transmission, or distribution of an energy resource or electricity for which—
      1. an authorization is required under a Federal law other than the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); and
        1. the head of the lead agency has determined that an environmental impact statement is required; or
        2. the head of the lead agency has determined that an environmental assessment is required, and the project sponsor requests that the project be treated as an energy project.
    3. Environmental impact statement.—The term ``environmental impact statement’’ means the detailed statement of environmental impacts required to be prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    4. Environmental review and authorization process.—The term ``environmental review and authorization process’’ means—
      1. the process for preparing for an energy project an environmental impact statement, environmental assessment, categorical exclusion, or other document prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); and
      2. the completion of any authorization decision required for an energy project under any Federal law other than the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    5. Lead agency.—The term ``lead agency’’ means—
      1. the Department of Energy;
      2. the Department of the Interior;
      3. the Department of Agriculture;
      4. the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission;
      5. the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; or
      6. any other appropriate Federal agency, as applicable, that may be responsible for navigating the energy project through the environmental review and authorization process.
    6. Project sponsor.—The term ``project sponsor’’ means an agency or other entity, including any private or public- private entity, that seeks approval from a lead agency for an energy project.
  2. Timely Authorizations for Energy Projects.—
    1. In general.—
      1. Deadline.—Except as provided in subparagraph (C), all authorization decisions necessary for the construction of an energy project shall be completed by not later than 90 days after the date of the issuance of a record of decision for the energy project by the lead agency.
      2. Detail.—The final environmental impact statement for an energy project shall include an adequate level of detail to inform decisions necessary for the role of any Federal agency involved in the environmental review and authorization process for the energy project.
      3. Extension of deadline.—The head of a lead agency may extend the deadline under subparagraph (A) if—
        1. Federal law prohibits the lead agency or another agency from issuing an approval or permit within the period described in that subparagraph;
        2. the project sponsor requests that the permit or approval follow a different timeline; or
        3. an extension would facilitate completion of the environmental review and authorization process of the energy project.
    2. Energy project schedule.—To the maximum extent practicable and consistent with applicable Federal law, for an energy project, the lead agency shall develop, in concurrence with the project sponsor, a schedule for the energy project that is consistent with a time period of not more than 2 years for the completion of the environmental review and authorization process for an energy project, as measured from, as applicable—
      1. the date of publication of a notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement to the record of decision; or
      2. the date on which the head of the lead agency determines that an environmental assessment is required to a finding of no significant impact.
    3. Length of environmental impact statement.—
      1. In general.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law and except as provided in subparagraph (B), to the maximum extent practicable, the text of the items described in paragraphs (4) through (6) of section 1502.10(a) of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations), of an environmental impact statement for an energy project shall be 200 pages or fewer.
      2. Exemption.—The text referred to in subparagraph (A) of an environmental impact statement for an energy project may exceed 200 pages if the lead agency establishes a new page limit for the environmental impact statement for that energy project.
  3. Deadline for Filing Energy-related Causes of Action.—
    1. Definitions.—In this subsection:
      1. Agency action.—The term ``agency action’’ has the meaning given the term in section 551 of title 5, United States Code.
      2. Energy-related cause of action.—The term ``energy- related cause of action’’ means a cause of action that—
        1. is filed on or after the date of enactment of this Act; and
        2. seeks judicial review of a final agency action to issue a permit, license, or other form of agency permission for an energy project.
    2. Deadline for filing.—
      1. In general.—Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal law, an energy-related cause of action shall be filed by—
        1. not later than 60 days after the date of publication of the applicable final agency action; or
        2. if another Federal law provides for an earlier deadline than the deadline described in clause (i), the earlier deadline.
      2. Prohibition.—An energy-related cause of action that is not filed within the applicable time period described in subparagraph (A) shall be barred.
    3. Application of Categorical Exclusions for Energy Projects.—In carrying out requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) for an energy project, a Federal agency may use categorical exclusions designated under that Act in the implementing regulations of any other agency, subject to the conditions that—
      1. the agency makes a determination, in consultation with the lead agency, that the categorical exclusion applies to the energy project;
      2. the energy project satisfies the conditions for a categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); and
      3. the use of the categorical exclusion does not otherwise conflict with the implementing regulations of the agency, except any list of the agency that designates categorical exclusions.

    SEC. 60605. FRACTURING AUTHORITY WITHIN STATES.

    1. Definition of Federal Land.—In this section, the term ``Federal land’’ means—
      1. public lands (as defined in section 103 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1702));
      2. National Forest System land;
      3. land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Reclamation; and
      4. land under the jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers.
    2. State Authority.—
      1. In general.—A State shall have the sole authority to promulgate or enforce any regulation, guidance, or permit requirement regarding the treatment of a well by the application of fluids under pressure to which propping agents may be added for the expressly designed purpose of initiating or propagating fractures in a target geologic formation in order to enhance production of oil, natural gas, or geothermal production activities on or under any land within the boundaries of the State.
      2. Federal land.—The treatment of a well by the application of fluids under pressure to which propping agents may be added for the expressly designed purpose of initiating or propagating fractures in a target geologic formation in order to enhance production of oil, natural gas, or geothermal production activities on Federal land shall be subject to the law of the State in which the land is located.

    SEC. 60606. FEDERAL LAND FREEDOM.

    1. Definitions.—In this section:
      1. Available federal land.—The term ``available Federal land’’ means any Federal land that, as of May 31, 2013—
        1. is located within the boundaries of a State;
        2. is not held by the United States in trust for the benefit of a federally recognized Indian Tribe;
        3. is not a unit of the National Park System;
        4. is not a unit of the National Wildlife Refuge System; and
        5. is not a congressionally designated wilderness area.
      2. State.—The term ``State’’ means—
        1. a State; and
        2. the District of Columbia.
      3. State leasing, permitting, and regulatory program.—The term ``State leasing, permitting, and regulatory program’’ means a program established pursuant to State law that regulates the exploration and development of oil, natural gas, and other forms of energy on land located in the State.
    2. State Control of Energy Development and Production on All Available Federal Land.—
      1. State leasing, permitting, and regulatory programs.— Any State that has established a State leasing, permitting, and regulatory program may—
        1. submit to the Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture, and Energy a declaration that a State leasing, permitting, and regulatory program has been established or amended; and
        2. seek to transfer responsibility for leasing, permitting, and regulating oil, natural gas, and other forms of energy development from the Federal Government to the State.
      2. State action authorized.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, on submission of a declaration under paragraph (1)(A), the State submitting the declaration may lease, permit, and regulate the exploration and development of oil, natural gas, and other forms of energy on Federal land located in the State in lieu of the Federal Government.
      3. Effect of state action.—Any action by a State to lease, permit, or regulate the exploration and development of oil, natural gas, and other forms of energy pursuant to paragraph (2) shall not be subject to, or considered a Federal action, Federal permit, or Federal license under—
        1. subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the ``Administrative Procedure Act’‘);
        2. division A of subtitle III of title 54, United States Code;
        3. the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); or
        4. the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    3. No Effect on Federal Revenues.—
      1. In general.—Any lease or permit issued by a State pursuant to subsection (b) shall include provisions for the collection of royalties or other revenues in an amount equal to the amount of royalties or revenues that would have been collected if the lease or permit had been issued by the Federal Government.
      2. Disposition of revenues.—Any revenues collected by a State from leasing or permitting on Federal land pursuant to subsection (b) shall be deposited in the same Federal account in which the revenues would have been deposited if the lease or permit had been issued by the Federal Government.
      3. Effect on state processing fees.—Nothing in this section prohibits a State from collecting and retaining a fee from an applicant to cover the administrative costs of processing an application for a lease or permit.

    SEC. 60607. EXPEDITING COMPLETION OF THE MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE.

    1. Definition of Mountain Valley Pipeline.—In this section, the term ``Mountain Valley Pipeline’’ means the Mountain Valley Pipeline project, as generally described and approved in Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Docket Nos. CP16-10 and CP19-477.
    2. Expedited Approval.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later than 21 days after the date of enactment of this Act and for the purpose of facilitating the completion of the Mountain Valley Pipeline—
      1. the Secretary of the Army shall issue all permits or verifications necessary—
        1. to complete the construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline across the waters of the United States; and
        2. to allow for the operation and maintenance of the Mountain Valley Pipeline;
      2. the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall approve any amendments to the certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on October 13, 2017, and grant any extensions that are necessary—
        1. to complete the construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline; and
        2. to allow for the operation and maintenance of the Mountain Valley Pipeline;
      3. the Secretary of Agriculture shall amend the Land and Resource Management Plan for the Jefferson National Forest in a manner that is substantively identical to the record of decision with respect to the Mountain Valley Pipeline issued on January 11, 2021; and
      4. the Secretary of the Interior shall—
        1. reissue the biological opinion and incidental take statement for the Mountain Valley Pipeline in a manner that is substantively identical to the biological opinion and incidental take statement previously issued on September 4, 2020; and
        2. grant all necessary rights-of-way and temporary use permits in a manner that is substantively identical to the those permits approved in the record of decision with respect to the Mountain Valley Pipeline issued on January 14, 2021.
      5. Judicial Review.—No action taken by the Secretary of the Army, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Secretary of Agriculture, or the Secretary of the Interior that grants an authorization, permit, verification, biological opinion, incidental take statement, or any other approval related to the Mountain Valley Pipeline, including the issuance of any authorization, permit, verification, authorization, biological opinion, incidental take statement, or other approval described in subsection (b), shall be subject to judicial review.
      6. Effect.—This section preempts any statute (including any other section of this Act), regulation, judicial decision, or agency guidance that is inconsistent with the issuance of any authorization, permit, verification, authorization, biological opinion, incidental take statement, or other approval described in subsection (b).

      SEC. 60608. FASTER PROJECT CONSULTATION.

      Section 7(b)(1) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536(b)(1)) is amended—
      1. in subparagraph (A), by striking ``90-day’’ and inserting ``60-day’’; and
      2. in subparagraph (B)—
        1. in the matter preceding clause (i)—
          1. by striking ``90 days’’ and inserting ``60 days’’; and
          2. by striking ``90th day’’ and inserting ``60th day’’;
        2. in clause (i), in the matter preceding subclause (I), by striking ``150th day’’ and inserting ``100th day’’; and
        3. in clause (ii), by striking ``150 or more’’ and inserting ``100 or more’’.

      SEC. 60609. NEW SOURCE REVIEW PERMITTING.

      1. Clarification of Definition of a Modification for Emission Rate Increases, Pollution Control, Efficiency, Safety, and Reliability Projects.—Paragraph (4) of section 111(a) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7411(a)) is amended—
        1. by inserting ``(A)’’ before ``The term’’;
        2. by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``. For purposes of the preceding sentence, a change increases the amount of any air pollutant emitted by such source only if the maximum hourly emission rate of an air pollutant that is achievable by such source after the change is higher than the maximum hourly emission rate of such air pollutant that was achievable by such source during any hour in the 10-year period immediately preceding the change’’; and
        3. by adding at the end the following: ``(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the term `modification’ does not include a change at a stationary source that is designed— ``(i) to reduce the amount of any air pollutant emitted by the source per unit of production; or ``(ii) to restore, maintain, or improve the reliability of operations at, or the safety of, the source, except, with respect to either clause (i) or (ii), when the change would be a modification as defined in subparagraph (A) and the Administrator determines that the increase in the maximum achievable hourly emission rate of a pollutant from such change would cause an adverse effect on human health or the environment.’’.
        4. Clarification of Definition of Construction for Prevention of Significant Deterioration.—Subparagraph (C) of section 169(2) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7479(2)) is amended to read as follows: ``==(C)== The term `construction’, when used in connection with a major emitting facility, includes a modification (as defined in section 111(a)) at such facility, except that for purposes of this subparagraph a modification does not include a change at a major emitting facility that does not result in a significant emissions increase, or a significant net emissions increase, in annual actual emissions at such facility.’’.
        5. Clarification of Definition of Modifications and Modified for Nonattainment Areas.—Paragraph (4) of section 171 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7501) is amended to read as follows: ``(4) The terms `modifications’ and `modified’ mean a modification as defined in section 111(a)(4), except that such terms do not include a change at a major emitting facility that does not result in a significant emissions increase, or a significant net emissions increase, in annual actual emissions at such facility.’’.
        6. Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section shall be construed to treat any change as a modification for purposes of any provision of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) if such change would not have been so treated as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act.

        SEC. 60610. PROHIBITION ON RETROACTIVE PERMIT VETOES.

        Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) is amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
        `` (c) Authority of EPA Administrator.—
        ``(1) Possible prohibition of specification.—Until such time as the Secretary has issued a permit under this section, the Administrator may prohibit the specification (including the withdrawal of specification) of any defined area as a disposal site, and the Administrator may deny or restrict the use of any defined area for specification (including the withdrawal of specification) as a disposal site, whenever the Administrator determines, after notice and opportunity for public hearings, that the discharge of such materials into such area will have an unacceptable adverse effect on municipal water supplies, shellfish beds and fishery areas (including spawning and breeding areas), wildlife, or recreational areas.
        ``(2) Consultation required.—Before making a determination under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall consult with the Secretary.
        ``(3) Written findings required.—The Administrator shall set forth in writing and make public the findings and reasons of the Administrator for making any determination under this subsection.’’.

People Vs. Fossil Fuels: Youth-Led Action

Posted by Brad Johnson Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:00:00 GMT

President Biden has a choice to make: Will he side with the people or a handful of fossil fuel executives? It’s a test with results that will determine the future of our planet and the wellbeing of future generations that will inhabit it. We are putting our bodies on the line to ensure President Biden passes this crucial test.

As we face the worsening climate emergency, frontline communities have been fighting the fossil fuel projects which threaten their health and homes for generations. While our government has largely ignored their demands, climate chaos has intensified across the globe. The Glasgow UN climate summit in November is the “last, best chance” for our government to change course and ensure a just, renewable energy future for all of us.

From October 11-15, we will gather in DC for the largest civil disobedience action in decades, demanding President Biden use his executive authority to hasten the end of the era of fossil fuels.

Join us.

This is not a single “day of action”, but instead a wave of action from October 11th – 15th that will involve civil disobedience to put sustained pressure and a bigger spotlight on our demands. If that involves risking arrest, we are prepared and willing to take that risk and deal with the consequences. We believe that the risks of inaction are far greater than the risks of taking action.

All components of the actions — trainings the night before and the start of the actions themselves — will be at McPherson Square in downtown DC. The McPherson Square Metro station is on the orange, blue, and silver lines; Farragut North (red line) is also very close by.

People Vs. Fossil Fuels: We need real solutions

Posted by Brad Johnson Thu, 14 Oct 2021 12:00:00 GMT

President Biden has a choice to make: Will he side with the people or a handful of fossil fuel executives? It’s a test with results that will determine the future of our planet and the wellbeing of future generations that will inhabit it. We are putting our bodies on the line to ensure President Biden passes this crucial test.

As we face the worsening climate emergency, frontline communities have been fighting the fossil fuel projects which threaten their health and homes for generations. While our government has largely ignored their demands, climate chaos has intensified across the globe. The Glasgow UN climate summit in November is the “last, best chance” for our government to change course and ensure a just, renewable energy future for all of us.

From October 11-15, we will gather in DC for the largest civil disobedience action in decades, demanding President Biden use his executive authority to hasten the end of the era of fossil fuels.

Join us.

This is not a single “day of action”, but instead a wave of action from October 11th – 15th that will involve civil disobedience to put sustained pressure and a bigger spotlight on our demands. If that involves risking arrest, we are prepared and willing to take that risk and deal with the consequences. We believe that the risks of inaction are far greater than the risks of taking action.

All components of the actions — trainings the night before and the start of the actions themselves — will be at McPherson Square in downtown DC. The McPherson Square Metro station is on the orange, blue, and silver lines; Farragut North (red line) is also very close by.

People Vs. Fossil Fuels: Climate chaos is happening now

Posted by Brad Johnson Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:00:00 GMT

President Biden has a choice to make: Will he side with the people or a handful of fossil fuel executives? It’s a test with results that will determine the future of our planet and the wellbeing of future generations that will inhabit it. We are putting our bodies on the line to ensure President Biden passes this crucial test.

As we face the worsening climate emergency, frontline communities have been fighting the fossil fuel projects which threaten their health and homes for generations. While our government has largely ignored their demands, climate chaos has intensified across the globe. The Glasgow UN climate summit in November is the “last, best chance” for our government to change course and ensure a just, renewable energy future for all of us.

From October 11-15, we will gather in DC for the largest civil disobedience action in decades, demanding President Biden use his executive authority to hasten the end of the era of fossil fuels.

Join us.

This is not a single “day of action”, but instead a wave of action from October 11th – 15th that will involve civil disobedience to put sustained pressure and a bigger spotlight on our demands. If that involves risking arrest, we are prepared and willing to take that risk and deal with the consequences. We believe that the risks of inaction are far greater than the risks of taking action.

All components of the actions — trainings the night before and the start of the actions themselves — will be at McPherson Square in downtown DC. The McPherson Square Metro station is on the orange, blue, and silver lines; Farragut North (red line) is also very close by.

People Vs. Fossil Fuels: Fossil fuels are driving the climate crisis

Posted by Brad Johnson Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:00:00 GMT

President Biden has a choice to make: Will he side with the people or a handful of fossil fuel executives? It’s a test with results that will determine the future of our planet and the wellbeing of future generations that will inhabit it. We are putting our bodies on the line to ensure President Biden passes this crucial test.

As we face the worsening climate emergency, frontline communities have been fighting the fossil fuel projects which threaten their health and homes for generations. While our government has largely ignored their demands, climate chaos has intensified across the globe. The Glasgow UN climate summit in November is the “last, best chance” for our government to change course and ensure a just, renewable energy future for all of us.

From October 11-15, we will gather in DC for the largest civil disobedience action in decades, demanding President Biden use his executive authority to hasten the end of the era of fossil fuels.

Join us.

This is not a single “day of action”, but instead a wave of action from October 11th – 15th that will involve civil disobedience to put sustained pressure and a bigger spotlight on our demands. If that involves risking arrest, we are prepared and willing to take that risk and deal with the consequences. We believe that the risks of inaction are far greater than the risks of taking action.

All components of the actions — trainings the night before and the start of the actions themselves — will be at McPherson Square in downtown DC. The McPherson Square Metro station is on the orange, blue, and silver lines; Farragut North (red line) is also very close by.

People Vs. Fossil Fuels: Indigenous Peoples Day

Posted by Brad Johnson Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:00:00 GMT

President Biden has a choice to make: Will he side with the people or a handful of fossil fuel executives? It’s a test with results that will determine the future of our planet and the wellbeing of future generations that will inhabit it. We are putting our bodies on the line to ensure President Biden passes this crucial test.

As we face the worsening climate emergency, frontline communities have been fighting the fossil fuel projects which threaten their health and homes for generations. While our government has largely ignored their demands, climate chaos has intensified across the globe. The Glasgow UN climate summit in November is the “last, best chance” for our government to change course and ensure a just, renewable energy future for all of us.

From October 11-15, we will gather in DC for the largest civil disobedience action in decades, demanding President Biden use his executive authority to hasten the end of the era of fossil fuels.

Join us.

This is not a single “day of action”, but instead a wave of action from October 11th – 15th that will involve civil disobedience to put sustained pressure and a bigger spotlight on our demands. If that involves risking arrest, we are prepared and willing to take that risk and deal with the consequences. We believe that the risks of inaction are far greater than the risks of taking action.

All components of the actions — trainings the night before and the start of the actions themselves — will be at McPherson Square in downtown DC. The McPherson Square Metro station is on the orange, blue, and silver lines; Farragut North (red line) is also very close by.

Climate Justice Components Of Build Back Better Agenda Have Been Pared Back, With Further Cuts Possible

Posted by Brad Johnson Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:14:00 GMT

In its reconciliation package, the House of Representatives restored some of Biden’s requested funding for climate justice measures that had been slashed by the U.S. Senate’s bipartisan deal, but massive cuts remain.

If the White House heeds the “no double dip” deal it made with Senate centrists, the House funds will be eliminated.

Two Build Back Better climate-justice programs that were cut in the Senate’s infrastructure package (known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework, or BIF) are funded at or above President Biden’s requested levels:

  • Building electric vehicle charging stations, raised $15 billion to $21 billion
  • Replacing the nation’s lead pipes, fully restored to $45 billion

However, most face massive cuts, with no prospect for improvement:

  • Reconnecting minority communities cut off by highway projects, cut 79% from $24 billion to $4.95 billion
  • Investing in electric school buses, cut 63% from $20 billion to $7.5 billion
  • Road safety, including “vision zero” programs to protect pedestrians, cut 45% from $20 billion to $11 billion (only $100 million added)
  • Upgrading and modernizing America’s drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater systems, cut 40% from $56 billion to $33.7 billion
  • Repairing and modernizing public transit, cut 36% from $85 billion to $54 billion
  • Broadband infrastructure, cut 31% from $100 billion to $69 billion
  • Investing in passenger and freight rail, cut 5% from $80 billion to $76 billion
Furthermore, the House added on additional funding for the programs that act as bailouts for polluters:
  • Capping orphan wells, increased to $18.5 billion, 16% over Biden’s request
  • Brownfield and Superfund, increased to $20 billion, three times Biden’s request

The BIF includes the Civil Nuclear Credit Program, a $6 billion bailout fund for existing nuclear plants.

The Clean Electricity Performance Program (CEPP) is a major climate initiative in the House reconciliation package, establishing a sort of carbon cap-and-trade system for electric utilities with the goal of increasing low-carbon electricity production to 80 percent of the mix by 2030. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) has indicated his desire to modify the CEPP to lower its standards to support natural-gas plants.

Markup of the Build Back Better Act (Day 4)

Posted by Brad Johnson Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:00:00 GMT

Build Back Better Act: Transportation

Posted by Brad Johnson Tue, 14 Sep 2021 14:00:00 GMT

The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure will hold a markup to consider the following:

Legislative proposals to comply with the reconciliation directive included in section 2002 of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2022, S. Con. Res. 14

Includes, among other provisions:
  • $950 million for community climate incentive grants under the Federal Highway Administration
Amendments

Markup of the Build Back Better Act (Day 3)

Posted by Brad Johnson Tue, 14 Sep 2021 13:00:00 GMT

Older posts: 1 2 3 ... 5